The White Residence denied Saturday that President Donald Trump experienced been briefed on intelligence that reportedly showed Russia experienced made available bounties to Taliban-joined militants if they killed US troopers in Afghanistan.
The benefits purportedly gave incentives to the guerrillas to goal US forces, just as Trump attempts to withdraw troops — meeting just one of the militants’ key demands — and end America’s longest war.
It was to start with claimed by The New York Situations on Friday. The newspaper, citing nameless officers, claimed that Trump was briefed on the results in March, but has not decided how to react.
Push secretary Kayleigh McEnany mentioned “neither the President nor the Vice President had been briefed on the alleged Russian bounty intelligence.”
But she additional: “This does not communicate to the benefit of the alleged intelligence but to the inaccuracy of The New York Times story erroneously suggesting that President Trump was briefed on this make any difference.”
That still left open up the likelihood this kind of intelligence does exist.
The Taliban have denied the report, reiterating that it was committed to an accord signed with Washington in February that paves the way for withdrawing all overseas forces from Afghanistan by upcoming yr.
The militants also explained handmade explosives account for most fatalities among US forces.
“The nineteen-12 months jihad of the Islamic Emirate is not indebted to the beneficence of any intelligence organ or international nation,” the Taliban explained in a assertion issued in Kabul.
The group, commonly believed to have acquired years of aid from Pakistani intelligence, also denied prior US accusations it was provided arms by Russia.
“The Islamic Emirate has created use of weapons, facilities and instruments … that had been already existing in Afghanistan or are war spoils frequently seized from the opposition in battles,” it said.
Russia has also denounced the report, with its embassy in Washington tweeting that the “baseless and nameless accusations” in the Moments story had “already led to direct threats to the daily life of staff members” at its embassies in Washington and London.
“End creating #fakenews that provoke everyday living threats, @nytimes,” it extra in a later tweet.
Russia has a tortured background in Afghanistan, where by the former Soviet Union in its ultimate decades was bogged down in a devastating fight against Islamist guerrillas, then backed by Washington.
The New York Situations stated there have been distinct theories on why Russia would help Taliban assaults, which include a want to preserve Washington bogged down in war.
It explained that the Russian device may well also be trying to get revenge about the US killing of Russian mercenaries in Syria, wherever Moscow backs President Bashar al-Assad.
According to the newspaper, the Taliban operation was led by a unit acknowledged as the G.R.U., which has been blamed in several international incidents which include a 2018 chemical weapons assault in Britain that practically killed Russian-born double agent Sergei Skripal.
(Besides for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is published from a syndicated feed.)