U.S. election crimes official quits after AG Barr authorizes voter fraud probes – National

U.S. election crimes official quits after AG Barr authorizes voter fraud probes - National

The U.S. Department of Justice official who oversees election crimes resigned in protest Monday after Attorney General William Barr authorized federal prosecutors across the country to pursue “substantial allegations” of voting irregularities, if they exist, before the 2020 presidential race is certified.

The resignation was confirmed by the New York Times and CNN shortly after news of Barr’s memo was made public. The attorney general’s actions came despite no evidence of widespread fraud.

It also comes days after Democrat Joe Biden defeated President Donald Trump and raises the prospect that Trump will use the Justice Department to try to challenge the outcome. It gives prosecutors the ability to go around longstanding Justice Department policy that normally would prohibit such overt actions before the election is certified.

Read more:
Biden is the projected winner of the U.S. election. What if Trump refuses to concede?

Story continues below advertisement

Trump has not conceded the election and is instead claiming without evidence that there has been a widespread, multi-state conspiracy by Democrats to skew the vote tally in Biden’s favour.

Biden holds a sizable lead in multiple battleground states and there has been no indication of enough improperly counted or illegally cast votes that would shift the outcome. In fact, election officials from both political parties have publicly stated the election went well, though there have been minor issues that are typical in elections, including voting machines breaking and ballots that were miscast and lost.

In a memo to U.S. attorneys, obtained by The Associated Press, Barr wrote that investigations “may be conducted if there are clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State.”






U.S. election: RNC chair refuses to provide evidence to support party’s claims of voter fraud


U.S. election: RNC chair refuses to provide evidence to support party’s claims of voter fraud
READ  Coronavirus: What's happening in Canada and around the world on Saturday

He said any allegations that would “clearly not impact the outcome of a federal election” should be delayed until after those elections are certified and prosecutors should likely open so-called preliminary inquiries, which would allow investigators and prosecutors to see if there is evidence that would allow them to take further investigative measures.

Story continues below advertisement

Barr does not identify any specific instances of purported fraud in the memo.

“While it is imperative that credible allegations be addressed in a timely and effective manner, it is equally imperative that Department personnel exercise appropriate caution and maintain the Department’s absolute commitment to fairness, neutrality and non-partisanship,” Barr wrote.

According to the New York Times and CNN, Richard Pilger, the director of the elections crimes branch of the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, informed his colleagues of his resignation in an email.

“Having familiarized myself with the new policy and its ramifications, I must regretfully resign from my role as director of the Elections Crimes Branch,” the email said, according to the New York Times.

The Times said Pilger would move to another role within the Justice Department, while CNN said it was not clear in the email if Pilger would stay in the department at all.

Read more:
U.S. election: Here’s what happens until Joe Biden, Kamala Harris are inaugurated

States have until Dec. 8 to resolve election disputes, including recounts and court contests over the results. Members of the Electoral College meet Dec. 14 to finalize the outcome.

Barr, a loyal ally of President Donald Trump, helped broadcast Trump’s claims of voter fraud before the election, attacking mail-in voting as prone to undue influence and coercion, despite multiple studies debunking the notion of pervasive voter fraud in general and in the vote-by-mail process.

Story continues below advertisement

Generally, Justice Department policy is “not to conduct overt investigations, including interviews with individual voters, until after the outcome of the election allegedly affected by the fraud is certified.”

But Barr argues in the memo that concerns such acts could inadvertently impact an election are minimized once voting has concluded and that, in some cases, investigations could not be delayed until the election is certified.

A Justice Department official said Barr had not been asked by Trump, anyone else at the White House or any lawmakers to issue the memo. The official could not discuss the matter publicly and spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity.


Click to play video 'Biden moves ahead with transition of power plans'



Biden moves ahead with transition of power plans


Biden moves ahead with transition of power plans

Barr was in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office on Capitol Hill on Monday afternoon and refused to answer questions from reporters when he left. Earlier Monday, McConnell threw his support behind Trump after a period of post-election silence.

Story continues below advertisement

Biden campaign attorney Bob Bauer said in a statement that it is “deeply unfortunate that Attorney General Barr chose to issue a memorandum that will only fuel the `specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims’ he professes to guard against.”

“Those are the very kind of claims that the president and his lawyers are making unsuccessfully every day, as their lawsuits are laughed out of one court after another,” Bauer said. “But, in the end, American democracy is stronger than any clumsy and cynical partisan political scheme.”

In a series of tweets Monday evening, commissioner of the U.S. Federal Election Commission Ellen Weintraub, said the U.S. has just had a “well-run election, despite difficult circumstances, with zero evidence of widespread fraud.”

She said “scattershot legal challenges” have been brought across the country, “none of which can fairly be called ‘substantial allegations.’”

Weintraub continued, saying none of the challenges have been backed by evidence, adding that none of the court cases would “change the result of the election.”

“We have seen no evidence that would justify a Department of Justice probe,” she wrote.

“The Attorney General’s move raises grave concerns that he is citing to advance a preferred political narrative rather than following the facts and law.”

-With files from Sean Boynton and Hannah Jackson, Global News




© 2020 The Canadian Press

Written By
More from Alec Woods

UCP government staffers’ to take indefinite seven per cent pay cut

Article content continued The pay cuts will be in effect indefinitely. NDP...
Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *