Legal objections: Planned flight from UK to Rwanda carrying asylum seekers halted

Legal objections: Planned flight from UK to Rwanda carrying asylum seekers halted
abroad legal objections

Planned flight carrying asylum seekers from UK to Rwanda halted

Britain must stop controversial deportation flight to Rwanda

At the last minute, the British government had to halt an deportation flight to Rwanda following the intervention of the European Court of Human Rights. Strasbourg’s court saw “a real risk of irreversible damage” for those affected.

Shock to Boris Johnson’s new asylum policy: Rwanda’s first deportation flight for asylum seekers has been halted due to legal objections. The European Court of Human Rights intervened.

DHe had first planned a deportation flight from Great Britain to Rwanda with asylum seekers of various nationalities, which was halted by a court shortly before departure. This was confirmed by the British Home Office BBCAfter thwarting the plans of the British government with a rare intervention by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. There is “a real risk of irreparable harm” to the asylum seekers concerned, the court found.

Due to legal objections, flight tickets of the last remaining asylum seekers were cancelled, the organization explained. Care4Calais on Twitter, Originally, 130 deportees were targeted. In the end, the British authorities booked 31 tickets. According to Care4Calais, these tickets were gradually canceled due to pending legal decisions.

Here you will find content from Twitter

Your revocable consent is required for the transmission and processing of personal data, in order to display embedded content, as providers of embedded content require this consent, as do third-party providers [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR], By setting the switch to “On”, you agree to it (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the United States, in accordance with Art 49(1)(a) GDPR. You can get more information about this. You may withdraw your consent at any time via the switch and through the privacy policy at the bottom of the page.

British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said on Tuesday: “I cannot say how many people will be on board, when only a handful of deportations were planned.” “The really important thing is that we introduce the theory.” A little later, however, the European Court of Human Rights also intervened – and has now apparently reversed the entire action.

The court initially asked Great Britain not to take an Iraqi asylum seeker to Rwanda for some time. The court’s decision was made on Tuesday evening, shortly before the man was to be taken to the East African country along with others.

All others associated with Misal then sued in British courts and the flight was halted.

Home Secretary Priti Patel said she was “disappointed” but not disappointed. The next deportation flight is already being prepared.

The British court allowed the government to proceed

In a so-called interim measure, the court asked the British authorities to take the men out of the country no earlier than three weeks following the final decision in ongoing proceedings in Great Britain. The court should be informed of the final decision. According to the court, interim measures are binding and apply only very rarely and when there is an imminent risk of irreparable harm.

read also

A British court in London had previously ruled that the flight could take off as scheduled – but announced it would review the new law again. If this is not legal, affected people can return to Great Britain from Rwanda.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson insisted he would not deviate from his new asylum plan. It was always clear to him that its implementation would involve a long road with many legal hurdles.

Britain has signed a deal with Rwanda to crack down on irregular migration. People entering the UK illegally, regardless of their nationality or origin, must be brought into the country, and given the opportunity to apply for asylum there. Even if they are recognized as refugees there, there should never be a return to Great Britain. The United Nations sees this as a violation of international law and a dangerous precedent.

The European Court of Human Rights, located in Strasbourg, France, is part of the Council of Europe. Bodies independent of the European Union work together to protect human rights in the 46 member states.

You can listen to our WELT podcast here

Your revocable consent is required for the transmission and processing of personal data, in order to display embedded content, as providers of embedded content require this consent, as do third-party providers [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR], By setting the switch to “On”, you agree to it (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the United States, in accordance with Art 49(1)(a) GDPR. You can get more information about this. You may withdraw your consent at any time via the switch and through the privacy policy at the bottom of the page.

“Kick-Off Politics” is WELT’s daily news podcast. Most important topics analyzed by WELT editors and dates of the day. subscribe to podcast Spotify, Apple Podcasts, amazon music Or directly through the RSS feed.

READ  France Covid-19: Mask rule for Parisians amid 'undeniable surge'
Written By
More from Cary Payne
United States: Border police arrest 213,000 people after illegally entering Mexico
position on the border between America And Mexico is getting intense. As...
Read More
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.